Pat -
<font color="blue"> I'm sorry you are taking all this OVER SERIOUSLY and feel the need to cary it to such lengths. </font color>
When talking about the safety of a child in the scenario as laid out in this thread, I do not believe one can be too serious. We’re talking about a REAL mother with REAL kids - not some academic exercise but REAL PEOPLE. That makes a difference.
<font color="blue">I'm sure if you take a deep breath and think about it unemotionally for a moment you will reconsider any remarks you have made that insinuate either of us have a callous disregard for child safety are excessive. </font color>
I saw you and Egon going on about how a .17HMR/.22Mag/.22LR is "plenty ‘o gun" to hunt coyotes. Considering the subject (defense of a child), that in itself illustrates a callous disregard for child safety by failing to consider the potential consequences of using such a small round.
<font color="blue">Ahh what a "good job", all the requisite elements, righteous indignation, selflessness, child welfare... </font color>
So be it - at least it’s sincere.
<font color="blue">No one has come close to trying to secure "bragging" rights for saving a child by a thin margin of ballistic sufficiency through the application of their superhuman marksmanship directed by steady nerves in a time of peril. Geesh! </font color>
Re-read Egon's last response. Even if it is "tongue-in-cheek" it sure comes across as bragging about marksmanship abilities with an inferior cartridge.
<font color="blue">I felt as you did regarding the African lion but the responsible party is not subject to hysteria, has seen several examples of mountain lions AND African lions, claims to know the difference, and insists it was an African lion. </font color>
I’m not saying your friend is purposefully lying about it (although that is a possibility) - he may very well believe that’s what he saw, but without any direct evidence (police report, photos, newspaper headlines, etc.), I'm sure you will understand my reluctance to take such a story at face value.
<font color="blue">The way I remember it a couple comments were made regarding the fact that a .22 rimfine will kill a coyote and SHAZAM!!! we are off to the races. </font color>
The way **I** remember it a mother, concerned for the safety of her children, asked for hunting tips - upon which I stated that certain cartridges were unsuitable in my opinion. Three posts later (by you) you’d insulted the original poster saying she was unrealistic and wanted to live in a "Disney Land" and insulted me (and her) by saying the only reason to kill a problem coyote is some revenge based version of bloodlust we have. Funny how different people will take away entirely different things from the exact same wording...
<font color="blue">I do not have any problem with your basic thesis. You are RIGHT. I know that, Egon knows that, EVERYONE knows that. There really isn't any NEED to go to great lengths to DEFEND yourself as you aren't being attacked. </font color>
Fine - if that’s your "official position" now I’ll take it at face value and ignore my interpretation of your earlier comments.
The way I see it, this thread is now going nowhere fast. I propose we agree to end it now so we can avoid the inevitable continuation which would serve little purpose.